Police spend £7.2m on PO investigation in 5 years, interviewing 4 people

Op Olympus “Gold” Commander Stephen Clayman speaking to ITV News last year

The police have spent £7,246,000 since 2020 investigating possible crimes committed by Post Office and Fujitsu execs relating to the Horizon scandal. In five years the detectives working for Operation Olympos have conducted a total of seven interviews with four people. No arrests have been made.

The investigation began shortly after the judge in the Bates v Post Office high court litigation announced he had such “grave concern” at the evidence given by Fujitsu employees in criminal and civil cases against Subpostmasters, and he was passing a file to the Director of Public Prosecutions. This he did, and the DPP gave the file to the Met. In January 2020, the Met began Operation Olympos.

The investigation expanded significantly last year and became a joint effort co-ordinated between the Met and the National Police Chiefs’ Council. Op Olympos now has 102 people working on it across various police forces. It is currently burning through more than three quarters of a million pounds a month. Costs for 2025/26 are expected to be more than £10m. The Home Office has separately spent £1.3m assisting Op Olympos since 2023.

This information has been given to me by the National Police Chiefs’ Council after a protracted series of requests dating back three years. It is an update on figures dug out under a Freedom of Information request by a campaigner reported in Computer Weekly earlier this year.

The breakdown of the costs are as follows:

Financial yearPolice spending
2019/2020£168,000
2020/2021£238,000
2021/2022£435,000
2022/2023£699,000
2023/2024£1,312,000
2024/2025£4,394,000
2025/2026£10.2m (projected)
Source: NPCC

In what will soon be a six year investigation, only four people have been called in for questioning. Seven interviews have been conducted in total. A man and woman, both in their 60s (believed to be Fujitsu engineers Gareth Jenkins and Anne Chambers), were interviewed under caution in late 2021. A man in his 60s was interviewed under caution in late 2024 and a man in his 60s was interviewed earlier this year. The police say “no arrests have been necessary given the interviews made under caution”.

I can’t help thinking they’d get somewhere quicker if they got a lot more than four people with questions to answer down the nick to ask some hard questions. Documents can’t point fingers – people can. The police say:

“Op Olympos is investigating the actions of 50 individuals over almost a 20-year period. This is by its very nature a methodical, painstaking, and detailed investigation. No charging decisions can be made until the full report from the Public Inquiry is released and fully reviewed.”

The Inquiry is now not expected to produce its final report until next year. The police have previously indicated they do not expect to lay any criminal charges before the 50 individuals under investigation until 2027 at the earliest. All they will say now is that “a number early advice case files have been compiled, ensuring that over time, we will be ready to submit for charging decisions.”

Op Olympos is being run by “Gold” Commander Stephen Clayman, overseen by a “Platinum” Group, led by the NPCC Chair, Chief Constable Gavin Stephens. Clayman is expected to surface in December to tell Subpostmaster groups and journalists the latest on the investigation. Last year Clayman told ITV News his investigation was sifting through 1.5m documents, focusing on the crimes of perjury and perverting the course of justice.

At this rate we’re unlikely to see any former Post Office or Fujitsu employee on trial before 2029 at the earliest. The Horizon IT system was rolled out in 1999. The Post Office started hiding miscarriages of justice in 2013.


The journalism on this blog is crowdfunded. If you would like to join the “secret email” newsletter, please consider making a one-off donation. The money is used to keep the contents of this website free. You will receive occasional, irregular but informative email updates about the Post Office Horizon IT scandal.

19 responses to “Police spend £7.2m on PO investigation in 5 years, interviewing 4 people”

  1. Mary in Southern California avatar
    Mary in Southern California

    View from the U.S., a country that deserves every bit of scorn, disrespect and anything else you want to throw our way because way fewer than 50% of our voting population elected the insane man who is running things (right now):
    Very ironic? Paradoxical? that the powers that be in the UK dragged their feet on doing anything on this scandal, probably because they were patiently waiting for victims to die. Now, a different branch of the powers that be is, with decades-late start, doing its business in a way that is waiting for some of the perpetrators to likely die before they are accountable for their egregious crimes. Fingers crossed that at some point at least one of these pompous jerks actually spends time behind bars. Justice delayed is justice denied.

  2. The first part of the Post Office Inquiry was published in July this year. Are we still expecting the second part before the end of this year?

  3. You guys need to be more patient and realistic.

    The police need to take time to get things right. The PO didn’t do that, it’s part of the reason why this terrible injustice happened in the first place.

  4. I’m guessing maybe if the king would get involved he MIGHT be able to spur some action? Has ever been involved or opined on this disaster?

  5. I don’t know why anyone would be shocked by this. It’s really the continuation of the debacle. I would be very surprised if anyone from POL or Fujitsu see either the inside of a court room or jail cell. In the end, the only one’s who’ll benefit are, you guessed it, the lawyers.

  6. If it takes 120 officers 5 years to interview 4 people at a cost of £7.2 million, how long will it take
    the same, or more, officers to investigate 50 people ?

    Are they flying everyone first class to the Bahamas for the interviews ?

    What an absolute shambles … is Paula Vennels in charge ?

  7. Justice delayed is justice denied.

    There’s a great irony in that the people best able to achieve this are lawyers and the wealthy, both of which categories some of the potential subjects of action fit into, and none at all in of the victims of the scandal.

  8. I had a two hour chat with a Detective from Olympos.He was suprised I asked to see his warrant card and puzzled when I questioned had he every investigated any POL related crimes(thanks to a legal eagle for providing the opening q’s).Long story short he hadnt read Nicks Book,watched Mr Bates v The Post Office or seen any Utube Horizon Inquiry footage.I asked if their was an appetite for prosecution and he said”Im here today and we have 120 working on the Investigation”That was a year ago.He was looking for the same names cropping up,Mandy,Rodric,Jarnail,Andy, Jack Straws wife.He couldnt say as a DI why John Scott wouldnt have mentiod his career as a plod and would not be drawn on why JS had such a brief spell as a Detective before switching careers……….

  9. out of interest was it only sub post offices that used the flawed system or did main post offices also use it.
    I guess not as they never get mentioned.

    1. Crown Post Offices also used Horizon

  10. The prison population is about to get considerably greyer because most of these people under investigation will be in their 70s by the time any trials are completed and guilty verdicts roll in. Meanwhile victims are still without enough money to rebuild what’s left of their lives.

  11. They’ll take as long as they like. Who’s going to stop them? Anyway, it’s only taxpayers’ money.

    The government, police, judiciary and ex public sector “privatised” monopolies such as the Post Office are all part of the same taxpayer-funded tribe. Your first book, Nick, exposed the institutionalised, jobs-for-life, customers-don’t-matter, decadently pensioned mindsets we’re dealing with. From the top to the bottom.

    Except we’re not dealing with any of it. Many who deserved fair compensation are now dead, the survivors will be dead eventually and the guilty will be dead before they’re named and punished. Drag your heels for long enough and the problem goes away. Even the taxpayer is eventually let off the hook, although other hooks can apparently be invented with ease once you’ve got the hang of it.

    1. “the guilty will be dead before they’re named and punished. ”

      Kicking the can down the road, for as long as is possible, so no one’s obliged to take the can back? Mixing two (connected, if only by the word ‘can’ ) metaphors…

      Has been done for a long time, but, the Hillsborough inquiry went on a long time, the Bloody Sunday one went on until recently (maybe it was OK to prosecute a squaddie once his CO had shuffled off?) The Malaya Massacre, perhaps some in Kenya, Aden atrocities… Why does anyone express surprise? Of course, if you give someone responsibility for a system, of which they know little, their ignorance can cause problems, the remediation costs of which are far greater than their salary, the company profits, the value of the business…

      As Upton Sinclair remarked, in “The Jungle” in 1905, 120 years ago… “The great corporation which employed you lied to you, and lied to the whole country—from top to bottom it was nothing but one gigantic lie.” Nowt new!

      He also opined that it was difficult to get a man to understand something, if his salary depended upon him not understanding… “I don’t care how you do it, get it done!” is how people are compelled do things to please their boss, and is how he can later claim to have had no knowledge of what they did…

  12. This TOTAL WASTE OF MONEY is abhorrent.
    There is no motivation here to seek the TRUTH or JUSTICE.
    With the current police activity regarding ” nasty words” this BLATENT lack of investigation amounts to the British police force IS NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE and beneath contempt.

  13. Need to know where to make one-off payment to.

  14. Vernon Stradling avatar
    Vernon Stradling

    They should be going for some early, easy wins pour encourager les autres.

    1. “They should be going for some early, easy wins pour encourager les autres.” You think? Voltaire didn’t necessarily agree.

      “Dans ce pays-ci, il est bon de tuer de temps en temps un amiral pour encourager les autres.”

      (In this country [England] it is good to kill, from time to time, an admiral in order to encourage the others.)

      It was / he was being satirical… I have read the quote attributed to Napoleon…

      Admiral John Byng was not legally declared innocent, but his execution remains controversial because while a court-martial found him guilty of “failing to do his utmost” during the Battle of Cape Minorca, it acquitted him of personal cowardice.

  15. I guess a certain amount of money would be spent educating officers as to how those concerned operated within their companies and the impact upon postmasters. Then, they’ll have to make a strong watertight case against those charged given the types of legal staff that could be employed to get them off so as to save face. We have seen what they are capable of. Can you imagine the uproar if they unsuccessfully prosecute someone whom the rest of us deem guilty given the evidence presented at the enquiry.

    1. “if they unsuccessfully prosecute someone whom the rest of us deem guilty given the evidence presented at the enquiry.”

      Arguably, the accused could / might say a fair trial, ( given public prejudice, comments written here and elsewhere, film, documentaries, books having been produced on the subject, etc…) Would be impossible

Leave a Reply to Andrea Edwards Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021


Subscribe For Latest Blog Updates

Tags

Alan Bates alice perkins Alwen Lyons Andrew Winn Andy Dunks Andy Parsons Bates v Post Office BBC Bonusgate CCRC Chris Aujard Clarke Advice DBT False Accounts Fujitsu Gareth Jenkins Grabiner HCAB Horizon Inquiry Interim Report Janet Skinner Jarnail Singh Kevin Hollinrake Lee Castleton Lord Arbuthnot Nicki Arch Nick Read Noel Thomas Paula Vennells Paul Marshall Post Office Rebecca Thomson Receipts and Payments mismatch bug Richard Moorhead Rob Wilson Rod Ismay Rodric Williams Second Sight Seema Misra Simon Clarke Susan Crichton Swift Review Tom Cooper Tracy Felstead

Categories