Post Office Inquiry final report delayed yet again

Sir Wyn Williams on the penultimate hearing day of the Inquiry in Dec 2024

The final report of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry has been delayed once more. Although no publication date was ever formally announced, the process is taking longer than anticipated, and participants have been told we are now highly unlikely to see the final report delivered to parliament before September this year.

In early 2025 I was told by sources close to the Inquiry that the Chair, Sir Wyn Williams, initially hoped to publish his final report in full in December 2025. Sir Wyn published volume one of the final report (dealing with human impact and compensation) in July 2025. When I asked my sources that autumn if the Inquiry was still on track to publish the remaining volume(s) before Christmas, they went very quiet.

Warning letters

Core participants to the Inquiry were subsequently told in November 2025 that Warning letters were not being sent until January 2026. Warning letters are part of what used to be known as the Maxwellisation process. They give named organisations and individuals the chance to see proposed criticism of them in an Inquiry report and respond in advance of publication. At the time, victims’ lawyers told their clients this meant publication of the report would be unlikely before June 2026.

We then discovered more Warning letters would be sent to named individuals in March and April this year, making the possibility of the report’s publication in June almost impossible.

The Inquiry has belatedly acknowledged this, telling core participants that the Warning letter process is not now scheduled to conclude before 31 August this year, whilst also suggesting it could go on into the autumn.

The very earliest that the Inquiry report could be published and laid before parliament is therefore September 2026, which even now looks deeply unlikely. We may soon get some clarity (and hopefully explanation) as I understand Sir Wyn Williams intends to deliver some kind of on-the-record update later this month.

Prosecutions a long way off

There are major implications to this latest delay. There is a likelihood, given the number and age of the people affected by this scandal, that more victims will die before Inquiry produces its final report. We also know that (for reasons which I still think don’t bear proper scrutiny), the police investigation into possible criminal activity at the Post Office (Operation Olympos) is waiting for the Inquiry’s final report before recommending charges to the Crown Prosecutions Service, despite spending what has ramped up to £750,000 a month on its own six year investigation. Op Olympos’ last pronouncement was a warning that notwithstanding the Inquiry’s final report, it needed the cash to nearly double the number of its investigators, or there would be no prosecutions for another five years.

The Post Office started falsely prosecuting people using Horizon data 26 years ago. Sir Alan Bates started his campaign for justice in 23 years ago. Seventeen years ago this November, the Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance was formed. Seven years ago, Sir Alan and his fellow Subpostmasters won their civil case at the High Court. In 2020 the first convictions were quashed, the police investigation (Operation Olympos) began and a review, which became the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry, was announced. The Inquiry (having been put on a statutory footing) launched proper four years ago. Its final open hearing was in December 2024. What’s another few months’ wait, eh?


The journalism on this blog is crowdfunded. If you would like to join the “secret email” newsletter, please consider making a one-off donation. The money is used to keep the contents of this website free. You will receive occasional, irregular but informative email updates about the Post Office Horizon IT scandal.

4 responses to “Post Office Inquiry final report delayed yet again”

  1. John O'SULLIVAN avatar
    John O’SULLIVAN

    We all knew the bad actors would on legal advice wait for the time to respond window to be reached.A Statutory Enquiry is Establishment Due Process

  2. Sally Stringer avatar

    Not surprised , the money gravy train chugs on. Dob find it offensive that the civil servant Mundy has got a gong for sacking Henry Staunton.
    closure would be useful to allow all to try and move on.

  3. Given the seemingly limited intellectual capacity of some of PO Witnesses, I expect they will need a good deal of help to understand any criticism of their actions. Assuming PO are paying for their legal support it would be amazing given their skills at obfuscation if the report becomes public this year given their skills at slowing everything down, plus the dead-hand of various Snivil Service departments. Add in the classic Inquiry sprawl; too many participants, too many avenues of exploration, and some loss of focus regarding the original intention. Look at the Chilcot Inquiry, 2009-2016, and The Bloody Sunday Inquiry (Saville Report) took over 12 years, 1998-2010. The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry looks positively speedy in comparison.

  4. Chris Stickland avatar
    Chris Stickland

    It seems almost as though they didn’t factor in the warning letters. This is typical British public inquiry, delay, delay, delay. We need a faster system more like the rest of Europe. Send it all straight to the CPS.
    It always seems like delay, delay is avoid, avoid or maybe deny deny maybe they are doing what the post office does is hide behind more legalise. I wonder how long Grenfell will take?
    Its time the innocent strikes back at the establishment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021


Tags

Alan Bates alice perkins Andrew Winn Andy Dunks Andy Parsons angela van den bogerd Bates v Post Office BBC Bonusgate CCRC Chris Aujard Clarke Advice DBT Eleanor Shaikh False Accounts Fujitsu Gareth Jenkins Grabiner HCAB Horizon Inquiry Interim Report Janet Skinner Jarnail Singh Kevin Hollinrake Lee Castleton Lord Arbuthnot Nicki Arch Nick Read Noel Thomas Paula Vennells Paul Marshall Post Office Receipts and Payments mismatch bug Rob Wilson Rod Ismay Rodric Williams Second Sight Seema Misra Simon Clarke SMB Susan Crichton Swift Review Tom Cooper Tracy Felstead

Categories